Odontologia

URI permanente para esta coleçãohttps://repositorioacademico.universidadebrasil.edu.br/handle/123456789/24

Navegar

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

Apicectomia e curetagem apical: relato de caso.
(Universidade Brasil, 2024) Santos, Amanda Ferreira Paulo dos; Ana Claudia Rodrigues da Silva
Endodontic treatment failure can be identified through clinical and radiographic evaluations, with symptoms such as spontaneous pain, sensitivity to palpation, vertical percussion pain, swelling, and the presence of periapical lesions. When these signs are detected, endodontic retreatment is usually the first approach; however, if this option is not feasible, periapical surgery may be recommended. The literature describes several techniques for these cases, including periapical curettage, apicoectomy, surgery with retrograde obturation, and retro-instrumentation with retro-obturation. The aim of this study is to report the case of a 41-year-old female patient who sought dental care due to the emergence of an intraoral fistula. After clinical and radiographic examinations, she was diagnosed with chronic periapical abscess in tooth 12. In the first consultation, a coronal access was performed, and root canal instrumentation was carried out up to the apical third, followed by intracanal medication with Ultracal for 15 days. In the second consultation, the persistence of the fistula led to the re-opening of the canal, re-instrumentation, and substitution of the medication, which remained for 30 days. In the third consultation, the regression of the fistula was noted, and the canal was obturated with Sealapex cement. However, after 30 days, the patient returned with the reappearance of the fistula. Given this scenario, periapical surgery was indicated and scheduled, including apicoectomy of the apical third and curettage of the endodontic lesion. Following the procedure, the patient did not report pain upon apical palpation, sensitivity to vertical percussion, spontaneous pain, or recurrence of the fistula during the 7-month postoperative follow-up. conclusion: When conventional endodontic treatment methods are not applicable or complications occur during the procedure, periapical surgery proves to be an effective alternative to preserve the tooth, restoring health, aesthetics, and function to the patient.
Cirurgia parendodôntica: relato de caso
(Universidade Brasil, 2023) Oliveira, Nicole Lauer; Bruzadin, Roberto Nascimento; Silva, Ana Claudia Rodrigues da
The failure of endodontic treatment can be confirmed through clinical and radiographic examinations, with the appearance of spontaneous pain, pain on palpation, vertical percussion, edema and the presence of periapical lesions. Given these signs and symptoms, endodontic retreatment is the first choice and when this is not possible, endodontic surgery is indicated. The main indications for surgery are: difficulty in accessing the root canal through the coronary approach, with the presence of a full metal-ceramic crown and intracanal pin, or calcified root canals with periapical lesions, fractured instruments, deviations, apical perforations and steps. Several techniques are described in the literature, including periapical curettage, apicoectomy, surgery with simultaneous retrograde filling, retro instrumentation with retro-filling are the most used. The objective of this work is to present a case report of a 25-year-old patient who sought out Universidade Brasil after the emergence of intraoral edema. The patient had previous root canal treatment and developed an acute periapical abscess after undergoing internal bleaching. In the 1st session, intraoral drainage and coronary opening were performed with the placement of intracanal medication Formocresol for 48 hours. In the 2nd session, during the removal of the filling material, she found a perforation in the middle third of the root. The filling material was removed to the location of the deviation, and Calcium Hydroxide medication was placed for 20 days. In the 3rd session, the canal was filled with Bio-C Repair (Angelus) and an apicoectomy of the apical third and curettage of the endodontic lesion were performed. The patient did not present pain on apical palpation, vertical percussion, spontaneous pain or edema in the postoperative period and in the 15-day follow-up. The patient will continue to be monitored for evaluation of the repair in the periapical region. When traditional methods of endodontic treatment are not viable, or when there are accidents during the intervention, endodontic surgery is an excellent alternative for maintaining the dental element, promoting health and restoring aesthetics and function to the patient.